5rJhgxyWVDo

Does anyone else see this an apples to oranges comparison? A $50K+ Mustang versus a $37K Camaro versus a 6.1L Challenger when the 6.4L is on the way, seems like a bad comparison to me. I would be more interested with a more comparable Mustang in there. If it was about the pinnacle of each car then they would have used the 700+HP Super Snake. I'd like to see this comparison done again in a couple years when the 6.4 is in the Dodge and the Z28 package comes out.

I agree, plus you put a supercharger on the camaro or challenger and the mustang wouldn't even come close to catching the two

Yeah it just feels like they stacked the deck against the Dodge and the Chevy. Been seeing that alot in all the Camaro v Challenger v Mustang comparisons. Like using the RT Challenger, and like always using the Mustang GT with Track Performance package. I've yet to see a comparison with a standard GT in it.